Auf den vermutlich\u00a021. September 2017. \u00a0Aus der E-Mail\u00a0http:\/\/mail.openjdk.java.net\/pipermail\/jdk9-dev\/2017-May\/005864.html von Mark Reinhold:<\/p>\n
As you probably know by now, the JCP Executive Committee (EC) recently voted [1] not to approve JSR 376, the Java Platform Module System [2], for the next stage of the process.<\/p>\n
This vote does not mean that JSR 376 is dead, nor that Jigsaw has been rejected. It only means that the EC raised a number of concerns that it wanted the JSR 376 Expert Group (EG) to address. The JCP rules give the EG thirty days, until 7 June, to submit a revised specification for a second EC vote, which will end no later than 26 June [3].<\/p>\n
The JSR 376 EG held a series of conference calls over the past two weeks in order discuss the EC’s concerns [4]. The net impact of those meetings on JDK 9 itself was to clarify the specification of the module system’s resolution algorithm, work on which had already begun, and to add one five-line method to the module-system API. These changes, together with additional clarifications to the JSR 376 and JSR 379 (Java SE 9) [5] Specifications, will hopefully address the EC’s concerns.<\/p>\n
In order to be ready for all possible outcomes I suggest that here in the JDK 9 Project we continue to work toward the current goal of producing an initial Release Candidate build on 22 June [6], but adjust the GA date in order to accommodate the additional time required to move through the JCP process. To be specific, I propose that we move the GA date out by eight weeks, from 27 July to 21 September.<\/p>\n
Comments on this proposal from JDK 9 Committers are welcome, as are reasoned objections. If no such objections are raised by 23:00 UTC next Tuesday, 6 June, or if they’re raised and satisfactorily answered, then per the JEP 2.0 process proposal [7] this will be the new schedule for JDK 9.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Auf den vermutlich\u00a021. September 2017. \u00a0Aus der E-Mail\u00a0http:\/\/mail.openjdk.java.net\/pipermail\/jdk9-dev\/2017-May\/005864.html von Mark Reinhold: As you probably know by now, the JCP Executive Committee (EC) recently voted [1] not to approve JSR 376, the Java Platform Module System [2], for the next stage of the process. This vote does not mean that JSR 376 is dead, nor that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[1,85],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein","category-java-9"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3840"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3840\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3846,"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3840\/revisions\/3846"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tutego.de\/blog\/javainsel\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}